Symbol and reference by Rita

My Summary about Symbol and reference in Semantic

this paper is a summary of my views on imaginative symbols in the aspects of their semantic structure and conceptual transpositions them as was defined in one of ny earlic works, sbol is a multi - notions conventional sign that represents, apart froms its inherent and immadiate design nature.

         the former by alogicalvlink (she lestiuk 1997:125). in semantic terms, in symbols we deal with a hierachy of meanings, where the direct meaning. contituters the first layer of sense and serves as a basis forvthe indirect (secondary) meaning-the second layer of sense and serves ar a basis for the indirec under the same clesing nator ( a nane avisualvimage , a signivicant object oe person. etc ) in an earliver work, discussed the indispenseble character of symbols, which are, in fact, the complex structure of a symbol. and the equally inportant status of meanings in it. ( seles tiuk1997) order inportant uf not inpensable , fe  atures of symbol are : imaginativenessc, motivations, immonent, polysemi archetion nature integration into the structures. I will not dwell here of chacof these features.

     but I willbregard some of them as I out line the esentials of the theory of symbols.
tgere may be more than one secondary voncept assosiaced with the immadiate the signatum in symbol.
I rever to this feature as immonent polysemi (selastiul 1997) philip were wright 1968:220 seems to symbols.
immonent polysemy of a symbols  means its implications! a cluster of conceptually disparate meanings related to a symbols( forexample fire- hearth and home.